BALANCING DEDUCTION OR BALANCING CHARGE

I had difficulties understanding the concept of BALANCING DEDUCTION and BALANCING CHARGE. These were my class notes below. I hope they will help in your case. The rates used refers to Kenya case only. In case of queries, you know how to get me.


This will happen where a person ceases to carry on the business for the purpose of which machinery was used or bought for and the machinery also ceases to be owned by him (Disposal of an asset). This deduction is to be adjusted from his taxable income from the business. However, two rules may be followed:
i)         In case no sale moneys are received by the person owning the machinery, or the written down value at the time of the cessation exceeds selling price, the balancing deduction shall be the written down value at the time of cessation, or the excess of written down value over selling price i.e. loss on sale of the machinery be reduced from taxable income
ii)       In case the sale moneys exceed the written down value the balancing charge shall be the amount of the excess or, where the written down value is nil, the selling price. i.e. profit on sale of machinery be added on taxable income

Examples

Arable Ltd commenced trading on 1st April 2009 as a manufacturer of farm equipments. The following information was available for nine month period ended 31st December 2009.
1.       The tax adjusted profit is Kshs. 20,889,000. This figure is before taking account of capital allowances and related expenses.
2.       Arable Ltd had a new factory constructed at a cost of Kshs. 4,000,000 that the company brought into use on 1st May 2009. The cost was made up as follows:

Land
1,200,000
Site Preparation
140,000
Professional fees
60,000
Drawing office serving the factory
400,000
Showroom
740,000
Factory
1,460,000

4,000,000

3.       Arable Ltd purchased the following assets in respect of the nine-month period ended 31st December 2009

15th April 2009
Machinery
310,000
18th April 2009
Building alterations necessary for the installation  of machinery
37,000
20th April 2009
Lorry
220,000
12th June 2009
Used Saloon car
112,000
14th June 2009
Pick - up
200,000
17th June 2009
Office Furniture
130,000
29thOctober 2009
Computer
54,000

4.       On 1st November 2009 Arable Ltd acquired a leasehold factory building that was built in 2005 and used for manufacturer of cosmetics by another firm for Kshs. 1,000,000 and Kshs. 750,000 for machinery in the building. Arable continued using this machinery and building immediately
5.       On 5th December 2009 Arable Ltd sold the pick-up at Kshs. 250,000
Required
a)       Calculate the amount of capital allowance
b)      Calculate the amount of tax to be paid by Arable Ltd

Suggested solution

a)       Capital Allowance

COST OF INDUSTRIAL BULDING
Kshs.



Site Preparation
140,000



Profesional fees
60,000



Drawing Office
400,000



Factory
1,460,000




2,060,000



COMPUTATION OF INVESTMENT ALLOWANCE



ASSET
Q.E
I.D 100%


Built Factory
2,060,000
2,060,000


Lease Hold Factory
0
0


Machinery in Leasehold
0
0


Machinery Bought
310,000
310,000


Building Alterations
37,000
37,000


TOTAL
2,407,000
2,407,000






COMPUTATION OF WEAR AND TEAR


WEAR AND TEAR ALLOWANCE
CLASS II
CLASS III
CLASS IV
TOTAL

30%
25%
12.5%

Lorry

220,000

220,000
Saloon Car

112,000

112,000
Office Furniture


130,000
130,000
Computer
54,000


54,000
TOTAL WRITTEN DOWN VALUES
54,000
332,000
130,000
516,000
WRITTEN DOWN ALLOWANCE
16,200
83,000
16,250
115,450





BALANCING CHARGE
Kshs.



Disposal proceed of pick-up
250,000



Cost (WDA)
200,000




50,000









b)      Tax Payable

ARABLE LTD


Computation of Income tax Payable for the 2009 year of income


Kshs.
Tax adjusted profit

20,889,000
ADD: Balancing Charge

50,000
LESS: Capital allowances:-


Investment allowance

2,407,000
Wear and Tear

115,450
Taxable Income

18,416,550



Tax
30% of Kshs.18,416,550
5,524,965

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

ARGUMENT FOR AND AGAINST PROFIT AND WEALTH MAXIMIZATION GOALS IN LIGHT OF CORPORATE FINANCE

TYPES, NATURE OF CONFLICTS, AGENT COSTS AND RESOLUTION IN AGENT RELATIONSHIP IN AN ORGANIZATION