THE ROLE AND IMPACT OF PRIVATE FOREIGN INVESTMENT IN DEVELOPING COUNTRIES WITH SPECIAL REFERENCE TO KENYA
A private foreign investment is an investment made by a private individual or a private entity in a
foreign country.
This type of investment differs from other investments made by
a foreign public or governmental entity in another country in that it is made
by an individual or a private entity. Also known as a personal foreign
investment, this type of investment frequently provides economic stimulation in
other countries. It is not always the case, but certain foreign investments are
sometimes considered to be a type of foreign aid, especially when made in
third-world nations or other struggling economies. Strict rules apply to
foreign investments and may vary according to the country where a private
foreign investment is being made.
Depending on the country, a personal foreign investment may include an
investment for personal use or may include a commercial investment. A
commercial foreign investment is one made in an industry that would be
considered commercially useful as opposed to another investment involving more
personal use, such as residential real estate. A personal foreign investment may include a
variety of investment types depending on what is permissible by the country
where an investment is being made, as well as what investments are available.
A private foreign investment is often one made in the private sector, as opposed to public exchanges, but investments are not always limited
to this type. Personal investments may also be made in public entities, which
are frequently referred to as a public foreign investment. Examples of a public
foreign investment include those made in a foreign country’s public
transportation system or in a foreign stock exchange.
Many view a private foreign investment as a sound strategy when trying to
diversify an investment portfolio, as one country’s economy may be better off
or worse off than another at any given time and can be leveraged in a
profitable fashion. A private foreign investment is also at times useful as a
hedge strategy when purchasing a different country’s currency to offset the
cost of supplies or products from a country. Some also use a private foreign
investment to retire in a foreign location while benefiting from equity when
investing in real property. Experts warn, however, that a private foreign
investment can be risky when a government is unstable or in places experiencing
political disturbance.
Foreign investors look for a strong “investment climate” in developing
countries. This is where society and politics are stable and there is “good
governance”, such that the economy is managed well, the public service is
efficient, flexible, and honest, laws and regulations are not unduly intrusive
or directive, and contracts are enforced in the courts. FPI responds most to
political, economic, and infrastructural features. In addition to social and
political stability, it is attracted by ready markets, high rates of return,
inexpensive and skilled labour, and cheap local inputs. It is deterred by
inadequate or expensive infrastructure and risk. Opportunities to sell products
in large or profitable markets occur domestically, in the poor country
receiving the investment, or abroad, including investors’ home countries.
Domestically, markets are created by a large or growing middle-class in the
population or by protection such as high tariffs or heavy regulations for
imported goods.
Openness to Foreign Investment
The
Government of Kenya encourages foreign direct investment. Multinational
companies make up a large percentage of Kenya's industrial sector. In the
past, Government support for foreign investment was often implicitly
conditioned on some form of joint venture whereby a related parastatal or a
politically well-connected individual became the local partner. This practice
is becoming less common with economic liberalization and privatization of
public sector enterprises. Particularly since 1994, the Government of Kenya has
sought out foreign investment through investment conferences and foreign trips
by the head of state.
Foreign investment is not routinely screened. Nevertheless, investors may choose to take advantage of the one-stop office of the Investment Promotion Center (IPC), created in 1982 under the Ministry of Finance, and an independent agency since 1986. The IPC sets minimal environmental, health and security requirements for its projects. An investment code has been in the works since 1994. The code would set forth guidelines on investment, enumerate the various investment incentives and mandate that all new projects obtain IPC approval. Efforts are under way to harmonize investment regimes in Kenya, Uganda and Tanzania and, eventually, to remove all tariff barriers between the three East African countries. In addition, the three Investment Authorities are working towards harmonizing the investment incentives.
It is Government of Kenya policy to encourage investment that will produce foreign exchange, provide employment, promote backward and forward linkages and transfer technology. The only significant sectors in which investment (foreign and domestic) is constrained are those where state corporations still enjoy a statutory or de facto monopoly. These are restricted almost entirely to infrastructure (e.g., power, posts, telecommunications, and ports) and the media (e.g., radio). Even in these sectors, ongoing commercialization and economic reform is expanding the room for private business.
Foreign
Private Investment (FPI) and Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) plays a big role
in economic development and growth of a country especially a developing country
like Kenya.
The impact of these investment are both beneficial and harmful to a country.
The following expounds on the impact and role
played by FPI in a country.
Enhance growth of domestic
FDI also
has potential to enhance growth of domestic firms through complementarity in production
and productivity spillovers (Borensztein et al., 1998). Phillips et al. (2001)
found that FDI stimulates domestic investment, with a 1% increase in the
FDI/GDP ratio followed by as much as a 0.80% increase in future domestic
investment/GDP ratio in Africa.
They conclude that FDI provides positive externalities and spillovers that make
private domestic investment more profitable. In a survey, they found that
nearly all interviewed business leaders in Kenya favoured foreign investment
and recognized that it offered them economic opportunities.
Impact of foreign investment on the economic
system
In fact,
foreign investment has served as a model for policies diffusing into the wider
society. This is apparent in the economic system in innumerable ways, including
in the reform of the banking system; the break-up of the monopolies of
state-owned import–export companies, with respect to cross border trading
rights; the opening and the reform of stock markets creating a culture of stock
ownership; and the expansion of private housing. Domestic private equity and
venture capital investments are also developing. Private Foreign Investment has
therefore played a significant role in the major changes experienced in these
sectors.
Corporate social responsibility
With
respect to social consciousness, foreign investment has inspired a rise in
awareness of and commitment to corporate social responsibility. Foreign
investment has also inspired the formation of business interest groups such as
those with a mission of social betterment, such as the Chamber of Commerce,
Export Promotion Council, Export Processing Zones Authority where majority of
businesses are owned by foreign investors. Foreign business interests have also
been approaching these organizations to ask them to take a prominent role in
proposing changes to legislative issues of common concern that would foster a
friendly economic environment to invest.
Fostering the development of society
n addition
to continuing to grow, albeit in newer and often more sophisticated forms than
FDI, foreign investment is responsible for fostering the development of
society. Foreign Direct Investment into Kenya
has brought with it several international private firm to invest in Kenya. Most of
these business firms stand for better quality life of their employees and the
community around the business. Kenya native business management have taken the
same course and are advocating for better working conditions of their
employees, investing heavily on Corporate Social Responsibility projects etc. Companies like Safaricom Ltd,
Kenya Commercial Bank, Equity Bank Ltd are giving quite an amount of resources
to support such projects as clean water, scholarships for financially needy
students. Firms with their parent companies overseas like Biersdolf East
Africa, Colgate and Palmolive, Nestle were able to attract the best experience
and qualified personnel due to packages and opportunities they offered their
employees and the community around them. Kenyan firms have slowly followed
suit.
Technology transfer and Progress
FDI
increases the rate of technological progress in the host country through a
contagion effect from the more advanced technology and management practices
used by the foreign firms (Findlay,
1978). This is through either copying the technology used by the foreign firms or
accessing the latest technology. Such technology transfers may take place as a
result of demonstration effects. Local firms may adopt technologies introduced
by foreign firms through imitation or reverse engineering; as a result of
labour turnover whereby workers trained by foreign firms transfer technological
knowledge to local firms or they start their own firms; and through demand
linkages whereby foreign firms provide services or inputs to local firms. Technology
transferred from foreign investment projects improves the efficiency of local
firms as well.
Integrate domestic markets into the global
economic system
PFI
can serve to integrate domestic markets into the global economic system far
more effectively than could have been achieved only by traditional trade flows.
The benefits from Private Foreign Investment will be enhanced in an open
investment environment with a democratic trade and investment regime, active
competition policies, macroeconomic stability and privatization and
deregulation. Under such conditions, FDI can play a key role in improving the
capacity of a country to correspond to global economic integration and future
national developmental strategies. In practice, the greater the openness and
freedom toward FDI, the more economic reforms and potential benefits that
receiving countries will reap. The country is generally perceived as the
Eastern and central Africa's hub for
Financial, Communication and Transportation services due to continued stability, foreign investment incentives offered by the
Kenyan Government like the EPZ.
Growth and development
Besides the addition to macroeconomic resources in developing countries
like Kenya,
PFI is believed to make other important contributions to growth and
development. First, it can raise tax revenues, create employment, and open new
markets for exports. In practice, though, performance in these areas does not
always meet expectations. Poor and developing countries often compete to offer
tax holidays as a way to attract investment. Employment may actually be lost,
if foreigners buy and re-structure inefficient existing enterprises, often
previously owned by the state. For instance, the government sold a large stake
in Telkom Kenya to Orange, a UK
telecommunication Firm. A sizebale number of employees were retrenched in order
to get back Telkom Kenya
on the profit path. PFI however has been know to create more jobs and increase
incomes of the poor. In turn, this generates the revenues that governments need
to expand access to health, education and infrastructure services and so help
improve productivity. The Kenya
annual budget for 2012/2013 will hit one trillion Kenya Shillings the highest
ever in the Eastern Africa. This budget will
highly be supported PFI projects in Kenya.
Bridge investment thresholds
FDI and FPI can help breach investment
thresholds. In poor countries especially, where government revenues are small
or the domestic financial system is shallow, foreign companies may be the only
ones to invest in projects with a high minimum financing threshold, such as
infrastructure or natural resource extraction. For instance Oil Exploration in
Northern part of Kenya,
Titanium mining at the Kenyan coast and coal mining in Eastern Province.
All these projects are being handle by Private Foreign Investors. PFI can also
help start an investment and growth dynamic that attracts further domestic and
foreign investment.
Lift productivity and competitiveness
FDI and FPI can lift productivity
and competitiveness by adding to the stock of capital equipment in the economy,
introducing new technology in production and new organizational structures and
management methods in companies, and training employees. Orange (UK) management
took over Telkom Kenya
and introduced some of the best technology in telecommunication industry in
voice, data and mobile money transactions.
Tend to concentrate on one or few areas
FDI tends to reinforce
existing patterns of economic structure. It concentrates in one or a few
sectors, often in industries with few linkages to the rest of the economy, such
as natural resources or light manufacturing (behind protective tariffs) for the
domestic market. FDI also concentrates in regions which already have the best infrastructure
and human capital. The agricultural sector and rural areas are particularly
neglected. This results in neglect of rural areas where the efforts are
concentrated on investment areas like the urban centres. This has been the case
for a couple of decades but the country management is opening up the rural
areas by building roads and expanding electricity to tap into the rich
agricultural production in the area.
Putting non-used resources to work
FDI also boosts
investment in other industries "by putting nonused resources to work, by
encouraging local suppliers to act as suppliers and distributors for foreign
corporations, and by helping disseminate efficient foreign product techniques
and management styles to local businesses" (John M. Rothgeb, Jr. 1989, pp.
82-3). Non-used deposits of coal in Eastern
Province and Titanium in
Kwale county are some of the resources that were lying idle. The resources will
be put into productive activities therefore benefiting the community and the
country. FDI and FPI directed at heavy intermediate or capital goods industries
are more likely to facilitate additional investment than FDI directed at
specific consumer goods industries.
Supplements domestic savings
Foreign investment
supplement domestic savings and harnesses them to secure a rapid rate of
growth. It serves as a stimulant to
additional domestic investment in the recipient country. By increasing the rate of capital formation
in the country, it goes a long way in removing the capital deficiency which is
the main hurdle in the economic growth.
Improves the balance of payments
FDI improves the balance
of payments and current account substantially if it is
directed towards the
production for exports or import replacement (Peter Hess and
Clark Ross, 1997, p.496).
The government budget balance also improves through
high tax revenue from
corporate profits, salaries of employees, and Value Added Tax (VAT) on
finished goods and
services. Nestle are large exporters of manufactured and processed foods.
Foreign investors are now oncentrating on the service industry in Kenya like the
tourism and hotel industry. This attracts foreign earnings that are much needed
to improve the balance of payments.
Some studies have
concentrated on the adverse effects of FDI on economic growth (Harry G.
Johnson, 1970; R.E. Caves, 1971; K. Griffin, 1972; H. Magdoff, 1976; V. Mahler,
1980). Among the many criticisms of FDI and FPI that have been mentioned are
the following:
(i).displacement of domestic resources and
discouragement of local entrepreneurship;
(ii).the
creation of a foreign enclave with little or no economic contact with the local
economy;
(iii).the inadequate
effort made to train and develop local managerial and technical talent and
draining off to other countries the best talent that is developed;
(iv).the failure to participate more
actively in community development, or alternatively, participating too actively
in local matters;
(v).the
lack of co-operation with host governments and a failure to co-ordinate
investment and production policies with the development priorities of the
country;
(vi).the creation of less competitive
markets in the long-run within the host country;
(vii).and an inappropriate
demonstration effect in consumption.
In recent years, the
argument focused on the cost of attracting foreign capital. The wide range of
incentives (tax concessions, supply of raw materials at subsidized prices,
access to foreign exchange) that developing countries adopt to attract foreign
investment have invariably led to inefficient allocation of resources. There
has been efforts to withdraw licences for EPZ Film Production companies
operating in Nairobi
for flouting EPZA regulations therefore gaining unfair advantage over other
Film Production companies.
Furthermore, the surplus
of capital produced in these countries has been "drained off by foreign
interests" in the form of "profit repatriation and interest
payments". This has reduced their ability to marshal the domestic
investment needed to promote economic growth.
Conclusion (source: African Economic Research Consortium Paper on Foreign
Direct Investment in Sub-Saharan Africa:
Origins, Targets, Impact and Potential)
It is generally
believed, however, that FDI provides positive net benefits to the host country.
As a consequence, many countries provide a range of incentives to entice FDI.
Incentives typically include tax and duty concessions and guarantees against
nationalization. Materials and equipment imports, for example, are often exempt
from import duties. Other tax concessions include tax holidays, accelerated
depreciation and exemption of investment income from the company income tax.
The export processing zones in Kenya,
for example, offer all investors a ten-year tax holiday, easy repatriation of
profits and little regulation with regard to environment protection and labour
standards.
Little research has been
done on the extent to which these investment incentives are effective in
attracting foreign firms, their cost in terms of forgone tax revenues and the
losses incurred from competition among countries to attract favoured firms.
Such a review of the incentive systems is important because of the poor
responsiveness of foreign investment in many African countries. The available
evidence regarding the efficacy of financial and fiscal incentives in attracting
FDI is ambiguous, not least because countries find themselves in competitive
bidding to their general detriment if “excessive” incentives are provided, with
little impact on the total supply of investment resources, justifying the case
for cooperation among these countries (Hoekman and Saggi, 1999). On the other
hand, such competition may serve as a signaling device, indicating the countries
where FDI is most valued and has the highest social return.
Empirical studies
generally find financial and fiscal incentives unimportant once other fundamental
determinants of FDI are taken into account, undermining the case for providing them,
making them pure transfers to multinational firms (Hoekman and Saggi, 1999).
According to Collier and Gunning (1999), while current tax rates in Africa are not particularly high, their imposition is
often arbitrary. There are also so many temporary tax exemptions for new
investors that the tax burden for long-standing investors is necessarily fairly
high, thereby discouraging long-term investment.
FDI has not played an
important role in the Kenyan economy despite the reforms that have been undertaken
and the many incentives provided to foreign investors. Over 1997– 2001, FDI was
about 0.6% of GDP, well below the African average of 1.9%. Since the 1980s, the
country has faced a declining net inflow of FDI compared with neighbouring
countries such as Uganda and
Tanzania.
In the early 1980s, for example, Kenya
accounted for 87% of the cumulative net FDI in East Africa.
By 2001, this was down to 21%, compared with 40% and 36% for Uganda and Tanzania, respectively. The country
has therefore lost its competitiveness in attracting FDI to the two neighbours
in the East African Community. There has been much concern among policy makers
in Kenya over the decline of
FDI, which they attribute to low investor confidence, resulting from
insecurity, corruption, poor infrastructure, high utility costs, high real
interest rates and limited legal recourse (Kenya, 2003).
References:
Lester Ross
(2007), The Role of Foreign Investment in China’s Transition
The General Agreement on
Tariffs and Trade (GATT, 1994)
The Multilateral
Agreement on Investment (Proposed Vision, OECD, 1998)
Alexander Gerschenkron,
(1966), “Economic Backwardness in Historical Perspective: A
Book of Essays;” Cambridge: Harvard
University Press, 21-85.
Avi Nov, (2004), “Tax
Incentives To Entice Foreign Direct Investment: Should There Be
A Distinction Between
Developed Countries And Developing Countries?” Virginia
Tax Review, 23, 685-697.
UNDP (United Nations
Development Programme) (2004), “Unleashing Entrepreneurship: Making Business
Work for the Poor”, report to the Secretary-General of the United Nations by
the Commission on Private Sector and Development, UNDP, New York.
UN Millennium Project
(2005), “Investing in Development: A Practical Plan to Achieve the Millennium
Development Goals”, UNDP, New York.
World Bank (2005c),
Doing Business in 2005: Removing Obstacles to Growth,World Bank, The
International Finance Corporation and Oxford University
Press
Rodney Schmidt and Roy
Culpeper, The North-South Institute, “Private foreign investment in the poorest
countries” Forum held on March 24, 2003 in England
Caves, R. E. (1971).
"International Corporations: The Industrial Economics of Foreign
Investment." Economica, vol. 38, February
The Africa-Asia Business
Forum Website - http://www.aabf.org/kenya_inv_guide.htm
Kenya Investment
Authority Website - http://www.investmentkenya.com
Export Processing Zones
Authority - http://www.epzakenya.com/
The Word Bank,
International Finance Corporation - http://www.doingbusiness.org/data/exploreeconomies/kenya/
African Economic
Research Consortium: Foreign Direct Investment in Sub-Saharan Africa: Origins,
Targets, Impact and Potential paper - http://www.aercafrica.org/documents/books/FDI_papers_booklength_volume.pdf
Comments
Post a Comment